Ilias Zimmermann vs Nicolas Bianchi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Oct at 10:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Zimmermann vs N. Bianchi

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zimmermann 1 - 0 Bianchi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilias Zimmermann winning 2 and Nicolas Bianchi winning 0. The last match between Ilias Zimmermann and Nicolas Bianchi was at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula, 06-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Ilias Zimmermann getting the victory 6-1 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zimmermann | 1 |
| Bianchi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Santa Margherita di Pula(10-06-25)
I. Zimmermann vs N. Bianchi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.57% (17-18) | Career Total W/L | 53.33% (80-70) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Zimmermann vs N. Bianchi Match Preview:
- In recent months, Ilias Zimmermann outperforms Nicolas Bianchi on second serve, winning 49.01% of points compared to Bianchi's 0%. Could this indicate Zimmermann's strength in serving under pressure?
- Zimmermann also leads in return games, securing 37.14% of opponent's second serve points, with Bianchi again at 0%. Does this suggest a stronger defensive game?
- Zimmermann has successfully saved 47.73% of breakpoints lately, whereas Bianchi has not saved any. This might hint at Zimmermann's composure during crucial moments.
- Zimmermann enjoys a higher overall win rate of 60% over the past year, while Bianchi has a flawless but limited match record winning his sole match. Can recent form beat experience here?
- Both prefer the Hard surface but Zimmermann has more diverse experience with different surfaces, which could be a strategic edge.
- Bianchi’s recent competition seems weaker, with opponents averaging a lower rank, unlike Zimmermann's average opponent ranking of 96. Does a tougher past competition prepare Zimmermann better for this face-off?
- If the match extends to a deciding set, both players show a record of winning, making it a potential thrilling finale.
Editorial Prediction (October 6, 2025, UTC):
With stronger recent stats on both serving and returning, Ilias Zimmermann exhibits a solid edge against Nicolas Bianchi, especially on second serves and critical breakpoint moments.
Though Bianchi maintains a 100% win rate, the limited matches and the level of competition might not be as indicative of consistent performance as Zimmermann's record.
Given the insights from both historical and current performance stats, Ilias Zimmermann appears better equipped and more likely to secure a victory in this matchup.
Ilias Zimmermann vs Nicolas Bianchi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Zimmermann vs N. Bianchi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 1 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:42:36 | Average Match Time | 0:42:36 |
| 61% (23/38) | 1st Serve % | 61% (14/23) |
| 83% (19/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 14% (2/14) |
| 33% (5/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 11% (1/9) |
| 100% (5/5) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 87% (20/23) | Return Points Win % | 37% (14/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Zimmermann Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
N. Bianchi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 3-0 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 1-6 7-6(1) 10-6 | ||
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
Q1 | L | 5-7 6-2 10-6 | ||
Q1 | L | 0-6 6-4 10-7 | ||

I. Zimmermann vs N. Bianchi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.57% (17/18) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.33% (80/70) |
| 48.65% (36/38) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.19% (175/154) |
| 49.48% (331/338) | Games Win/Loss | 51.73% (1554/1450) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 50.00% (15/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.15% (76/67) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 31 | Aces Total | 46 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 76 | Total Double Faults | 148 |
| 1:2:44 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 269.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 262.51 |
| 62% (866/1408) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1808/2839) |
| 62% (533/866) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1065/1808) |
| 44% (238/542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (458/1031) |
| 43% (70/162) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (104/271) |
| 43% (637/1482) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1068/2725) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 48.57% (17/18) | Futures W/L | 53.38% (79/69) |
| 49% (17/35) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (79/149) |
| 67% (4/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (13/19) |
| 50% (2/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 89% (18/16) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (83/71) |
| 11% (18/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (83/12) |
| 6% (17/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (67/9) |